Celiac Wire

Evidence map

Celiac children: what the evidence base looks like

8 publications, 0 of them trials and 6 syntheses. This page describes the shape of that literature rather than summarising its conclusions.

Updated 3 min read 8 citations

What the evidence on celiac children is made of Of 8 publications on this topic, the breakdown by study type: 6 meta-analysis, 1 review, 1 other. 611meta-analysis (6)review (1)other (1)
8 publications, by study type. Volume is not strength — the same count can be a settled question or a pile of commentary, and which one it is depends almost entirely on this breakdown. Harvested from PubMed and Crossref; publication type as recorded by the source.

What this literature is made of

The synthesis is ahead of the primary literature here — reviews and meta-analyses drawing on a modest number of underlying studies. Treat confident conclusions with the caution the sample size deserves.

The distinction that matters most is between synthesis and primary research. A meta-analysis pools trials and is the closest thing to a settled answer a field produces. A narrative review is one group's reading of the same material and can be selective without being dishonest. Counting them together, which most citation counts do, obscures exactly the thing you want to know.

When the celiac children literature was published Publication years for the 8 papers on this topic, grouped into bands from before 2015 through to 2023 onwards. 2023 onwards4 papers2015-20192 papersBefore 20151 papers2020-20221 papers
Still active. The most recent paper here is from 2025, so this is a field where an answer written today may not hold for long. Publication years as recorded by PubMed and Crossref.

How this page is built

Everything above is computed from the citations this site harvested from PubMed and Crossref, not written by hand. When the weekly harvest finds a new paper on this topic, these counts change and the characterisation changes with them. That is the point: a hand-written claim about how strong an evidence base is starts decaying the day it is written.

Publication type is taken as the source records it. That is imperfect — journals label inconsistently, and a paper indexed as a "review" may be a systematic one — so treat the bands as approximate. They are accurate enough to distinguish a trial literature from a commentary literature, which is the distinction that matters.

The strongest work on this topic

Ordered by study design first, then recency. The full set is listed in the references below.

  1. European Society for the Study of Coeliac Disease 2025 Updated Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Coeliac Disease in Adults. Part 1: Diagnostic Approach — Al-Toma A, Zingone F, Branchi F et al., 2025, clinical guideline
  2. Assessment of growth status and nutritional management of prematurely born infants after hospital discharge: A position paper of the ESPGHAN Nutrition Committee — Haiden N, Luque V, Domellöf M et al., 2025, clinical guideline
  3. Updated joint ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN guidelines for management of Helicobacter pylori infection in children and adolescents (2023) — Homan M, Jones NL, Bontems P et al., 2024, clinical guideline
  4. European Society for the Study of Coeliac Disease (ESsCD) guideline for coeliac disease and other gluten-related disorders — Al-Toma A, Volta U, Auricchio R et al., 2019, clinical guideline
  5. Global Prevalence of Celiac Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis — Singh P, Arora A, Strand TA et al., 2018, meta-analysis
  6. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease — Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP et al., 2013, clinical guideline
  7. Advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of celiac disease — Doyle JB, Silvester J, Ludvigsson JF et al., 2025, review
  8. European Society Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Guidelines for Diagnosing Coeliac Disease 2020 — Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabó I et al., 2020, journal article
How much research is there on celiac children?
8 publications are indexed here, of which 0 are trials and 6 are syntheses.
Does more research mean a stronger conclusion?
No. Composition matters more than volume — five randomised trials support a claim far better than fifty commentaries, and citation counts do not distinguish between them.
How current is this?
The most recent paper indexed here is from 2025. The set is refreshed weekly from PubMed and Crossref.
Why does this page not tell me the answer?
Because summarising a literature into a conclusion requires reading it, and doing that automatically is how confident nonsense gets published. This page tells you how much weight a conclusion could bear; the articles on this site do the interpreting.

References

Every citation below links to the original peer-reviewed record on PubMed or via DOI. Nothing here is a substitute for medical advice.

  1. Assessment of growth status and nutritional management of prematurely born infants after hospital discharge: A position paper of the ESPGHAN Nutrition Committee Haiden N, Luque V, Domellöf M, et al. · Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025 · Clinical guideline DOIPubMed 40341618
  2. European Society for the Study of Coeliac Disease 2025 Updated Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Coeliac Disease in Adults. Part 1: Diagnostic Approach Al-Toma A, Zingone F, Branchi F, et al. · United European gastroenterology journal · 2025 · Clinical guideline DOIPubMed 40999951Full text
  3. Updated joint ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN guidelines for management of Helicobacter pylori infection in children and adolescents (2023) Homan M, Jones NL, Bontems P, et al. · Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2024 · Clinical guideline DOIPubMed 39148213
  4. European Society for the Study of Coeliac Disease (ESsCD) guideline for coeliac disease and other gluten-related disorders Al-Toma A, Volta U, Auricchio R, et al. · United European gastroenterology journal · 2019 · Clinical guideline DOIPubMed 31210940Full text
  5. Global Prevalence of Celiac Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Singh P, Arora A, Strand TA, et al. · Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2018 · Meta-analysis DOIPubMed 29551598
  6. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, et al. · The American journal of gastroenterology · 2013 · Clinical guideline DOIPubMed 23609613Full text
  7. Advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of celiac disease Doyle JB, Silvester J, Ludvigsson JF, et al. · BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025 · Review DOIPubMed 41093604
  8. European Society Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Guidelines for Diagnosing Coeliac Disease 2020 Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabó I, et al. · Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2020 · Journal article DOIPubMed 31568151